NEWSLETTER
From the AAR President
Call for Papers
I am pleased to include in this issue a brief article by Lis Jump. Lis and I worked together briefly; I taught her a bit about automated reasoning, and she proceeded to "beat the teacher" -- by finding a far shorter proof than I had found of a particular problem in group theory. I encourage all of you now to try to "beat the student" or, better, to send us equally challenging problems. I firmly believe that such experimentation is the way to ever-more-powerful automated reasoning programs. (And then, you may announce your successes at one or more of the many conferences and workshops announced in this issue of the AAR Newsletter.
I have been studying automated reasoning with Dr. Larry Wos. As part of my studies, he suggested I revisit a problem from group theory that he had proven a few years ago. Wos used Otter to prove that Dr. Bill McCune's single axiom for groups of exponent 5 was indeed a single axiom. In short, the problem required that I prove
f(x,f(x,f(f(x,f(x,f(f(x,y),z))),f(e,f(z,f(z,f(z,z))))))) = yimplies
f(f(a,b),c) = f(a,f(b,c)) f(a,f(a,f(a,f(a,a)))) = e f(e,a) = a
with a single input file. Wos had originally obtained a 62-step forward proof of the above with no demodulation. I set out to use Otter to do something similar and in the process to learn more about automated reasoning.
Finding a forward proof of the theorem without using demodulation was nontrivial. Originally, I tried using Knuth-Bendix to find a proof and then eliminate demodulators individually, but had no success, so I started anew with a different tactic. First, I obtained a forward demodulation-free proof of the left identity. I added all of the steps of the proof to the hints list and moved left identity from the passive list to the set of support to create a different search space. Using this new search space, I achieved a forward proof of exponent five. I then eliminated the demodulators one at a time until the proof was demodulation free. I moved the steps of the new proof to the hints list and returned left identity from sos back to passive to obtain a forward proof of both left identity and exponent five with no demodulation. Finally, I replaced the current hints list with the hints generated from that proof and placed both left identity and exponent five in the set of support to try and obtain a proof of associativity. I proved associativity similarly, though it required a little more finesse. After this stage my proof was about 75 steps. This technique led me to a considerably different proof from the one obtained by Wos.
I then took my proof and attempted to shorten it. First, I took each step of the proof, individually, and demodulated it to junk so that it would not be available in the new proof. I considered all of the results and chose a few of the shortest, repeating the process until I was no longer obtaining shorter proofs. Then I had three different proofs, all about 68 steps long. Next, I experimented with various parameters for these proofs. I had the most success when I changed the backward subsumption hint weight from one to ten and set the order equations flag. This brought me a proof of 63 steps.
I took the 63-step proof and alternated between demodulating proof steps to junk and experimenting with various parameters. Using this method, I obtained a proof of 54 steps. Finally, at Wos's suggestion I placed the one axiom in the hot list, set heat to one, and repeated everything above. With this, I achieved a 51-step proof.
The final proof that I obtained had only sixteen steps in common with Wos's original 62-step proof. These include the three axioms required for the proof and the hypothesis.
Interested readers may examine the input file and proof , respectively.
TIME 2005
The 12th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning
will take place in Burlington, Vermont, June 23-25, 2005.
Of interest is research on time-related problems within areas such as
artificial intelligence, databases, and logic and computer-aided
verification. Special emphasis is on
new directions in time research.
All submissions must be done electronically through the symposium
Web page.
The submission deadline is January 22, 2005.
SPIN 2005
The 12th international SPIN Workshop on Model Checking of Software
will be held in
San Francisco on August 22-24, 2005.
SPIN 2005 solicits previously unpublished, currently unsubmitted,
original contributions addressing theoretical, experimental and
applied problems in model checking of software artifacts. Although
authors are encouraged to compare their work with existing model
checkers such as SPIN, the scope of the workshop is not limited to
topics directly related to the SPIN system.
Accepted contributions
will be included in the workshop proceedings which will be published
by Springer Verlag in the Lecture Notes in Computer Science series.
The submission deadline: April 1 (abstracts) and April 8, 2005 (papers).
For further information, see the
Web site.
FroCoS 2005
The 5th International Workshop on Frontiers of Combining Systems
(FroCoS 2005) will be held at Vienna, Austria, September 19-21,
2005. The general theme of FroCoS is the development of techniques and
methods for the combination, modularization and integration of systems
(with emphasis on logic-based ones), and of their practical use.
Topics of interest include the following:
Submission categories include full papers, for work on foundations,
applications, implementation techniques, and problem sets (up to 15
pages), as well as system descriptions (up to 8 pages), for describing
publicly available systems.
The submission deadline is May 2, 2005, for titles and abstracts, and May 9,
2005, for papers.
For further information see the
Web site.
PPDP 2005
The seventh ACM-SIGPLAN international symposium on Principles and
Practice of Declarative Programming (PPDP 2005) will be held
July 11-13, 2005, in Lisboa, Portugal.
PPDP 2005 aims to provide a forum that brings together those in the
declarative programming communities, including those working in the
logic, constraint and functional programming paradigms. The goal is
to stimulate research in the use of logical formalisms and methods for
specifying, performing, and analyzing computations, and to stimulate
cross-fertilization by including work from one community that could be
of particular interest and relevance to the others.
Topics include logic, constraint, and functional programming;
applications of declarative programming; methodologies for program
design and development; declarative aspects of object-oriented
programming; concurrent extensions to declarative languages;
declarative mobile computing; integration of paradigms; proof
theoretic and semantic foundations; type and module systems; program
analysis and verification; program transformation; abstract machines
and compilation; and programming environments.
The submission deadline is Feb. 13, 2005.
Consult the
Web for further details:
LICS 2005
The twentieth annual IEEE symposium on
Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2005)
will take place
June 26-29, 2005, in Chicago, Illinois.
The LICS symposium is an annual international forum on theoretical and
practical topics in computer science that relate to logic broadly
construed. Submissions are invited on topics that fit under that rubric,
including
automated deduction, categorical models and logics,
constraint programming,
formal aspects of program analysis,
formal methods,
lambda and combinatory calculi,
logics in artificial intelligence,
modal and temporal logics, model checking,
reasoning about security, rewriting, type systems and type
theory, and verification. Also welcome are submissions in emergent areas, such as
bioinformatics and quantum computation, if they have a substantial
connection with logic.
Authors are required to submit
a paper title and a short abstract of about 100 words
before submitting the extended abstract of the
paper. All submissions must be electronic.
Titles and short abstracts are due Jan. 5, 2005;
extended abstracts are due Jan. 10, 2005.
Authors will be notified of acceptance by March 18, 2005.
Detailed information about electronic paper submission will
be posted at the LICS
Web
site.
Short Presentations: LICS 2005 will have a session of short (5-10 minutes)
presentations. This session is intended for descriptions of work in
progress, student projects, and relevant research being published
elsewhere; other brief communications may be acceptable. Submissions for
these presentations, in the form of short abstracts (1 or 2 pages long),
should be entered at the LICS 2005 submission site March 19-25,
2005. Authors will be notified of acceptance or rejection by
April 1, 2005.
Kleene Award for Best Student Paper: An award in honor of the late
S. C. Kleene will be given for the best student paper, as judged by the
program committee. Details concerning eligibility criteria and procedure
for consideration for this award will be posted at the LICS website. The
program committee may decline to make the award or may split it among
several papers.
KI 2005
The 28th German conference on AI
will take place in Koblenz, Germany, on September 11-14, 2005.
This conference traditionally brings together academic and
industrial researchers from all areas of AI.
Researchers are invited to submit proposals for
technical papers
and workshops/tutorials.
Workshop/tutorial proposals must be submitted by February 18, 2005.
The deadline for submission of technical papers is April 15, 2005.
For detailed information
see the Web site on
workshops
and on
tutorials.
IWIL-2005
The fifth international workshop on the Implementation of Logics
will be
held in March 2005 in conjunction with the 11th International
Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and
Reasoning in Mondevideo, Uruguay.
Contributions are invited that describe implementation techniques
for and implementations of automated reasoning programs, theorem
provers for various logics, logic programming systems, and related
technologies. Topics of interest include
the following:
Of especial interest are contributions that help the
community understand how to build useful and powerful reasoning
systems.
Researchers interested in participating are invited to send a short
abstract (4-8 pages) to schulz@eprover.org by
Jan. 14, 2005.
Submissions should be in standard-conforming Postscript, PDF, or plain
ASCII. Final versions will likely be required to be in Postscript or
PDF and will be included in the proceedings. If possible, please use
(PDF)LaTeX and the standard article class.
Authors will be notified Feb. 11, 2005.
For information, see the
Web page.
ESSLLI'05 Student Session
The 17th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information (ESSLLI'05)
will be held August 8-19, 2005, in Edinburgh.
Included will be a Student Session (StuS),
and students (undergraduates as well as graduates) are invited to submit
papers for oral and poster presentation from the areas of logic,
language, and computation.
Student authors are invited to submit a full paper, not to exceed 7 pages
(exclusive of references). Papers are to be submitted with clear
indications of the selected modality of presentation: oral or
poster. The submissions will be reviewed by the student session program
committee and selected reviewers.
The preferred formats of submissions are PostScript, PDF, or plain text,
although other formats will also be accepted.
The paper and a separate identification page must be sent
electronically to gervain@sissa.it by Feb. 15, 2005.
For more information and the technical details of the submission, see
the
Web page.
The 20th international Conference on Automated Deduction
will take place in Tallinn, Estonia, July 22-27, 2005.
CADE is the major forum for the presentation of research
in all aspects of automated deduction.
Logics of interest include propositional, first-order, equational,
higher-order, classical, intuitionistic, constructive, modal,
temporal, many-valued, substructural, description, and meta-logics,
logical frameworks, type theory and set theory.
Methods of interest include saturation, resolution, tableaux,
sequent calculi, term rewriting, induction, unification, constraint
solving, decision procedures, model generation, model checking,
natural deduction, proof planning, proof presentation, proof checking,
and explanation.
Applications of interest include hardware and software development,
systems analysis and verification, deductive databases, functional and
logic programming, computer mathematics, natural language processing,
computational linguistics, robotics, planning, knowledge
representation, and other areas of AI.
Authors are invited to submit electronically (in postscript or PDF)
full papers for
work on foundations, applications or implementation techniques (15
pages), as well as system descriptions (5 pages) for describing
publicly available systems. For further information and submission
instructions, see the CADE-20
Web page.
Deadlines:
E-submission of title and abstract: February 25, 2005
E-submission papers: March 4, 2005
Notification of acceptance: April 22, 2005
Final version due: May 20, 2005
Invited talks will be given at CADE-20 by Randal Bryant (CMU), Gilles
Dowek (Ecole Polytechnique) and by Frank Wolter (U. Liverpool).
An election was held from September 23 through October 13 to fill
four positions on the board of trustees of CADE Inc. Maria Paola
Bonacina, David Basin, Gilles Dowek, Juergen Giesl, Rajeev Goré,
Hans de Nivelle, Geoff Sutcliffe, and Cesare Tinelli were nominated
for these positions. (See
AAR Newsletter No. 64, September
2004.)
Ballots were sent by electronic mail to all members of AAR on
September 23rd, for a total of 630 ballots (up from 587 in 2003, 566
in 2002, 548 in 2001, 445 in 2000 and 396 in 1999).
Of these, 125 were returned with a vote, representing a participation
level of 19.8% (the same percentage exactly as in 2003, but down from
26.3% in 2002, 22.5% in 2001, 24.5% in 2000, and 30% in 1999).
The majority is 50% of the votes plus 1, hence 63.
The following table reports the initial distribution of preferences
among the candidates:
No candidate reaches a majority right away. G. Dowek and H. de Nivelle
have the same number of first preference votes, but Dowek is higher in
the ranking because of receiving more second preference votes. The
redistribution of the votes of H. de Nivelle yields the following new
distribution:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of G. Dowek, one gets the following table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of J. Giesl, one gets the following table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of C. Tinelli, one gets the following table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of R. Goré, one gets the following table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of D. Basin, one gets the following table:
M. P. Bonacina is elected to the board of trustees.
The redistribution of the votes of the winner produces the following
table:
None of the candidates has a majority to be elected,
so the votes of H. de Nivelle need to be redistributed again:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of G. Dowek, one gets the following table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of C. Tinelli, one gets the following table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of J. Giesl, one gets the following table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of R. Goré, one gets the following table:
Thus, D. Basin is elected to the board of trustees. (Since 57 votes
does not suffice for the majority, the STV algorithm executes another
round distributing the votes of G. Sutcliffe, but this is not reported
because the outcome is obvious.)
The redistribution of the votes of the winner produces the following
table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of H. de Nivelle, one gets the following table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of J. Giesl, one gets the following table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of G. Dowek one gets the following table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of C. Tinelli, one gets the following table:
Thus, G. Sutcliffe is elected to the board of trustees.
The redistribution of the votes of the winner produces the following
table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of H. de Nivelle, one gets the following table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of J. Giesl, one gets the following table:
Again, no candidate reaches a majority, and by redistributing the
votes of G. Dowek, one gets the following table:
Thus, R. Goré is elected to the board of trustees.
After this election, the following people
are serving on the board of trustees of CADE Inc.:
Franz Baader (President, CADE-19 Program Chair, elected 10/2003)
On behalf of the AAR and CADE Inc., I thank Frank Pfenning for his
service as trustee and CADE Inc. president during the past 6 years,
Gilles Dowek and John Harrison for their service as trustees during
the past three years, all candidates for running in the election, all the
members who voted; and offer congratulations to David Basin, Maria
Paola Bonacina, Rajeev Goré, and Geoff Sutcliffe on being elected,
and to Franz Baader on being elected president of CADE Inc.
The TPTP (Thousands of Problems for Theorem Provers) Problem Library is a
library of test problems for automated theorem proving (ATP) systems. The TPTP
supplies the ATP community with
TPTP v3.0.0 is now available on the
Web.
The TPTP-v3.0.0.tar.gz file contains the library, including utilities and basic
documentation. Full documentation is
online.
The TPTP is regularly updated with new problems, additional information, and
enhanced utilities. If you would like to register as a TPTP user and be kept
informed of such developments, please email Geoff Sutcliffe.
What's New in TPTP v3.0.0
Changes from v2.7.0 to v3.0.0 for FOF problems
Changes from v2.7.0 to v3.0.0 for CNF problems
The library has been translated to the new TPTP syntax (aka the TSTP syntax).
Equality is now assumed to be built in, and all equality axioms have been
removed from all problems.
Problem status values have been updated to the SZS problem status ontology:
tptp1T has been updated to understand the new status values.
No numbers appear in any problems--numbers are now reserved for future
built-in treatment.
The tptp2X utility has been extended and improved:
Call for Papers
CADE News: CADE-20
CADE News: Results of the CADE Trustee Elections 2004
Amy Felty
(Secretary of AAR and CADE)
E-mail: afelty@site.uottawa.ca
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
M. P. Bonacina
30
22
22
15
3
0
2
31
125
D. Basin
22
19
9
13
5
5
3
49
125
G. Dowek
7
14
14
11
1
5
8
65
125
J. Giesl
10
10
11
10
7
9
3
65
125
R. Goré
15
18
17
13
3
4
0
55
125
H. de Nivelle
7
11
16
17
4
7
8
55
125
G. Sutcliffe
21
15
14
13
5
0
4
53
125
C. Tinelli
13
13
15
15
9
4
4
52
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
M. P. Bonacina
31
22
22
15
2
1
22
10
125
D. Basin
23
19
13
10
6
5
26
23
125
G. Dowek
7
15
17
7
4
9
34
32
125
J. Giesl
11
12
12
7
12
5
30
36
125
R. Goré
18
16
19
10
4
3
29
26
125
G. Sutcliffe
21
22
13
10
2
4
29
24
125
C. Tinelli
14
15
20
11
7
6
28
24
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
M. P. Bonacina
31
30
18
12
2
7
20
5
125
D. Basin
24
21
15
7
8
12
24
14
125
J. Giesl
13
10
13
13
9
13
34
20
125
R. Goré
20
16
20
9
4
15
25
16
125
G. Sutcliffe
23
22
15
8
3
18
24
12
125
C. Tinelli
14
20
22
7
8
18
20
16
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
M. P. Bonacina
33
31
21
7
6
11
14
2
125
D. Basin
27
21
16
8
11
11
23
8
125
R. Goré
22
17
20
10
11
12
23
10
125
G. Sutcliffe
25
23
13
10
15
13
19
7
125
C. Tinelli
17
19
20
12
15
13
22
7
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
M. P. Bonacina
38
38
14
6
7
12
10
0
125
D. Basin
30
23
18
8
8
23
13
2
125
R. Goré
24
22
19
12
7
21
18
2
125
G. Sutcliffe
29
22
14
17
10
17
13
3
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
M. P. Bonacina
46
42
6
5
13
8
5
0
125
D. Basin
35
28
14
6
15
19
7
1
125
G. Sutcliffe
36
21
23
6
17
11
10
1
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
M. P. Bonacina
64
30
0
12
14
2
3
0
125
G. Sutcliffe
44
36
1
12
21
7
3
1
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
D. Basin
30
18
10
10
4
4
35
14
125
G. Dowek
11
17
16
3
5
8
45
20
125
J. Giesl
13
11
12
12
9
3
50
15
125
R. Goré
17
27
16
5
5
0
41
14
125
H. de Nivelle
11
16
19
9
7
8
45
10
125
G. Sutcliffe
29
11
17
11
0
4
36
17
125
C. Tinelli
13
21
19
10
5
5
36
16
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
D. Basin
32
17
15
6
6
15
31
3
125
G. Dowek
11
21
13
5
9
19
42
5
125
J. Giesl
15
12
13
14
5
20
41
5
125
R. Goré
21
24
17
4
4
21
28
6
125
G. Sutcliffe
31
16
17
4
4
18
29
6
125
C. Tinelli
14
29
15
8
6
18
30
5
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
D. Basin
35
20
10
10
6
24
18
2
125
J. Giesl
17
10
21
10
11
25
29
2
125
R. Goré
24
25
14
6
12
20
21
3
125
G. Sutcliffe
33
18
17
3
14
18
19
3
125
C. Tinelli
15
37
11
6
16
14
24
2
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
D. Basin
38
23
13
3
20
19
8
1
125
J. Giesl
20
15
22
8
20
25
15
0
125
R. Goré
28
30
7
10
19
20
9
2
125
G. Sutcliffe
37
21
10
12
16
17
10
2
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
D. Basin
45
23
9
6
22
15
5
0
125
R. Goré
32
30
13
5
22
16
7
0
125
G. Sutcliffe
40
21
19
6
18
14
7
0
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
D. Basin
57
20
1
14
25
4
4
0
125
G. Sutcliffe
49
31
1
15
17
7
5
0
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
G. Dowek
18
16
11
6
8
24
35
7
125
J. Giesl
16
12
16
10
6
27
32
6
125
R. Goré
26
27
10
7
0
22
27
6
125
H. de Nivelle
12
23
16
11
8
25
27
3
125
G. Sutcliffe
32
16
17
3
4
25
20
8
125
C. Tinelli
20
19
19
8
7
23
22
7
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
G. Dowek
19
18
11
10
10
35
20
2
125
J. Giesl
18
14
18
9
11
31
23
1
125
R. Goré
30
24
12
4
9
29
15
2
125
G. Sutcliffe
35
24
8
5
13
23
14
3
125
C. Tinelli
22
26
16
7
12
25
16
1
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
G. Dowek
24
18
12
11
15
32
12
1
125
R. Goré
35
23
12
5
14
27
8
1
125
G. Sutcliffe
38
23
11
9
16
17
10
1
125
C. Tinelli
25
25
19
10
15
22
9
0
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
R. Goré
42
20
13
5
19
21
4
1
125
G. Sutcliffe
43
26
12
5
19
16
3
1
125
C. Tinelli
29
32
18
5
18
19
4
0
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
R. Goré
50
25
0
14
26
6
4
0
125
G. Sutcliffe
52
28
1
14
22
4
4
0
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
G. Dowek
22
16
11
7
18
32
16
3
125
J. Giesl
20
15
13
12
15
34
14
2
125
R. Goré
33
27
9
1
13
26
12
4
125
H. de Nivelle
19
23
13
10
18
30
9
3
125
C. Tinelli
29
19
16
9
12
24
13
3
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
G. Dowek
24
18
12
12
21
32
4
2
125
J. Giesl
23
18
15
10
24
26
8
1
125
R. Goré
38
25
6
7
20
21
6
2
125
C. Tinelli
35
23
12
9
18
20
7
1
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
G. Dowek
30
18
17
4
34
18
3
1
125
R. Goré
45
23
7
4
28
14
3
1
125
C. Tinelli
39
24
15
5
27
10
5
0
125
Candidate
1st pref.
2nd pref.
3rd pref.
4th pref.
5th pref.
6rd pref.
7th pref.
8th pref.
Total
R. Goré
54
21
0
14
26
7
2
1
125
C. Tinelli
48
30
1
13
25
5
3
0
125
David Basin (IJCAR 2004 Program Co-chair, elected 10/2004)
Peter Baumgartner (elected 10/2003)
Maria Paola Bonacina (Secretary 9/1999 to 5/2004, elected 10/2004)
Amy Felty (Secretary, appointed 5/2004)
Rajeev Goré (elected 10/2004)
Michael Kohlhase (elected 10/2000, reelected 10/2003)
Neil Murray (Treasurer)
Robert Nieuwenhuis (CADE-20 Program Chair)
Geoff Sutcliffe (elected 10/2004)
Andrei Voronkov (Vice President, CADE-18 Program Chair, elected 10/2002)
Toby Walsh (elected 10/2002)
The TPTP Problem Library, Release v3.0.0
(This release introduces the new TPTP syntax)
Geoff Sutcliffe
Dept. of Computer Science, University of Miami, USA
geoff@cs.miami.edu
The principal motivation for this project is to move the testing and evaluation
of ATP systems from the previously ad hoc situation onto a firm footing. This
became necessary, as results being published do not always accurately reflect
the capabilities of the ATP system being considered. A common library of
problems is necessary for meaningful system evaluations, meaningful system
comparisons, repeatability of testing, and the production of statistically
significant results. The TPTP is such a library.
Gail W. Pieper
pieper@mcs.anl.gov
December 2004